Dear Willy,
many thanks for your last, very insightful post future and please forgive my somewhat long silence. But I will again continue to work on our long Dialogue, take up a lot last ausdeiner speak and my argument as well as your thoughts continue with another piece.
You wrote in your last post separated from the transformations of Newtonian physics, the mass and energy to consider something new, a dynamic system of interaction effects donkey. Right here is for me the important point to which you then subsequently also take a very detailed reference: We are facing one (or better we are already in the midst of a) turning the view of the "what" and the "how something is."
Consider what is so out of your as well as my previous contributions seems clear that the reality does not simply have "things" but rather just "processes", especially processes of the interaction between limited entities (which in itself back processes, but it maybe in a future post later). Nothing is, everything is, one could formulate exaggerated.
As you mention correctly, yes we can perceive without interaction does not, and without awareness, it would indeed be difficult to have a reality. We have now shown very well and do it as a basis for our further discussion Just set a time.
But wait, before we go further, we should have a bit to deal with what the now a "process": there is no more and no less than the logical consequence of the two essential factors of our previous discussion, the finiteness of the " cellular structures "on the one hand and the interaction between them on the other.
First, the finite: no infinite system may be increased by an interaction ändern.Das say even our less enlightened past natural laws already. An infinite mass about (and every infinite system is always infinite in all its properties, otherwise it would not just endless!) Can not by a finite force (or Andeer a finite size effect can be changed). If force is mass times acceleration is equal, then at infinite mass and a finite force, the acceleration is always zero. Eh very clear. What else but finite force but should apply a finite system as a cellular interaction?
Where once the first part of the derivative: interaction, so the change because of the other is bound to finitude.
Now the second part: Every finite interaction between finite cellular processes change their character. I have already explained in my previous post future. This change is always alternately (see the example of supercooled tourers and the warming oven: The hikers will be comfortably heated, the furnace cold). Precondition is that possible between the two systems is an exchange. Interaction is only possible if a partner something "does not have" and another little "too much" has. This always refers to qualities (the "potentials"), in our case is about the temperature of the two bodies "oven" and "tourers". Then an interaction, which tries to compensate for this "potential difference.
We are richer by one more fact of flight, time. Each interaction changed the direction of these changes, we take as "time" is true. Time is nothing more than a hand, a product the finiteness of the fragmented our reality. She is on the other hand nothing but the manifestation of the fact that all the parts, all "cellular units" of our reality is in constant interaction, are therefore constantly changing. So without any interaction finitude, as a consequence of the finite but compelling interaction and it necessarily the Ableutung the time the sequence of changes in the various cellular structures due to the interaction. Reality is therefore not fixed, not a "thing in itself, but a constant flow of interaction and change, a process. Reality is a process.
But now it is exciting, we can ie two Types of processes to think. On the one hand, processes that lead to compensation and other self-organizing processes. Compensatory processes are tedious and can be dealt with here briefly: For them, the interaction leads simply to the fact that the cellular entities that are involved in moving closer in character and eventually be indistinguishable. If our tourers leaves his hut, because lures out in the sunshine in the morning, then the entities, "stove" and "office" soon finally reach a balance in temperature. Between them, no (heat) exchange is no longer possible, because they are in their nature (at least in terms of the exchange of heat approximate) finally complete: you eventually have the same temperature. We speak here also of the balance between n of them related to my potential, and nothing else so that when the they no longer have become distinct, that they have become for this particular emersion not just two, but just a system. If you like, they are in relation to the heat exchange "dead" now.
The second kind of processes on the basis of interaction is much more important. You have in your previous contributions have such interesting examples: the climate, the processes in the growing of biomass, and much more. These processes are characterized in that they lead not just to "balance", no death state. There are general development processes.
unetrescheidet Now what these development processes from those that lead to a dead balance? Here there is an answer out of your second last post: the pulse.
A pulse is a very special form of interaction: it is "temporary." This means that it is there once again and then just gone. Once on, one off, a wave that is. We can already see why nature builds its exchanges so often waves: Our reality is a self-organizing process that just builds on that interactions lead to something new and not the death of the involved systems.
The important thing for pulse-exchange transactions, that they create is always the possibility that the parties retain their ability to exchange systems. There is not a potential difference that is "used up" slowly but surely, but the potential difference, which is necessary for the exchange, is produced repeatedly anew. The pulse (ie the change in potential) which is offered increased, just the chance that an interaction takes place. If the potential of the "transmitter" is greater than that of the "recipient", so it can come to exchange ideas. The transmitter emits something that the recipient gets something. So that the receiver can again receive something, you have to give him "time" Get the digest. This "time" he needs to to run the processes in its interior (within the cellular structure) that make it again, "listening".
So, that was now safe to put it more roughly. We shall call the process of interaction with other cellular units once "perception" and those of "digesting" the effect "dissipation." And here is a new interesting question: How "digest" cellular systems, the interaction with other systems?
The interesting thing is that there is a clear direction of the dissipation. Cellular units to build structures to enable the next pulse if possible even better . Use This means that the processes need to be changed inside the individual cells. It must be "structures" are built. Here, structures no more than other internal "cellular units" that can interact with each other. The more and more diverse, these internal cellular units (which are nothing but more "processes"), the smaller are the potential differences that are necessary to the captured by the interaction "income" of the large private system within their own " "Exchange of cellular structure, the" big small ", the potential of the entire system held, and the more the next time Pulse are recorded.
There seems to a very clear logical line from the "finality" to the "interaction" of the "interaction" to "Time", by the time Auffassumg of reality as a "process" and from there to the momentum of the " Self-organization leads.
This is even a bit further substance to our future post.
perhaps very briefly to your criticism of the scientists, which I share but when I leave but perhaps more lenient rule. Scientists are just people like everyone else, they want respect and security. Bedie they get when they work within the Energy Conservation Code boundaries of their craft. Who brings the boat to shake is not very considered. Therefore, scientists are usually conservative and less innovative. That is one side. The other side is that in this trade also always great outsider and "Conqueror" is the reality that have the power to influence entire generations. Even to use this innovative power I believe in science, so slow, slow, may seem brutal and often without their spirit striving forward.
extent now of me and I've been waiting very excited about your next post!
Michael
0 comments:
Post a Comment