Homemade Telescope Camera Adapter

With or against the self-organization - The prelude to the future

Dear Willy,

is unfortunately a lot of time gone by since you gave me your last post you sent future. For my late reply, there are many reasons, but a very important, I believe we are entering a new Quality in our discourse.
To stay in our parable of the Ping-Pong, so we strain our common way of shaping the future of post over and over: your last ball was not returned I, you made the point! I think we have time being told all that the scientific basis for our further projects darstellt.Wir do so solutions to offer a good way in the future. If it is really important prevents us no one getting back science to argue further. Now, let us but turn to the conclusions which in our view of reality in general and the self-assembly in particular for concrete social development results.
So I will make a mark. Like any impact this will also be carefully considered and well placed. That is one reason for the long time of my silence, but now I think I have identified the point on your half of the table, I want to take in order to find again a good game. But first I must put myself in position to have to find exactly my position so I can set the correct premium. Therefore, I must be connected for a while with my view on the future and I think about the purpose of this next "game" stop.
must first agree to that course, that no one knows what the future actually will look like. I, too, and I think, not even you. There is simply no way to predict. Nevertheless, do the people since the beginning of time, even if they were always disappointed since then. Even today we see the weather report on television banned, probably know that the weather is so similar to or completely different can be. There must be something deeply human need in the future vision and it can not be the truth of the forecast, because otherwise we would have to have given up the long evolutionary. The most significant
look into the future seems to me the possibility of the orientation of one's actions. We always prepare ourselves for the future. We want the best out our future and the future of the people in our circle of life, our families and friends, our cities and countries, and indeed the world, makes. It is quite interesting that this "in-the-future-looks" very parallel to our ethical framework is: Our ethics we use to guide our actions. Incidentally, this analogy holds up to the Valuation: We take our expectations of the future as a measuring line for assessing the success of our actions. Similarly, we take our ethical framework to evaluate our actions ex post.
Why me this digression important? On the one hand, I want to show that the view into the future important for us humans, is so vital. He makes us human, it allows us to plan and evaluate our actions.
want other hand, I also recall are as closely related to our value system and our future vision together and interwoven. Future appears to be the place to meet the our forward-looking ratio and our ethos.
future vision obviously has two sides: an ethical and rational. A beschrebt the field of what is desirable and one that is possible, the probable describes. Also n the future we will post this dichotomy can not escape, though we will play heavily on the rational side.
Now a second coordinate my position. If we can once metaphysical methods for the future vision in mind (that is, all the nice ladies with crystal balls, the different oracle at Delphi and Olympia, the Leberbeschau and the interpretation of bird flight and many others, quite comprehensively what people use to satisfy their future urge all! ), then we shall for the determination of the future, only the knowledge of the present are available. Already we are in a nice and inescapable paradox: we know only ensures that the future will be different than the present. Nevertheless, we must take this in hand, what we know about the present. Actually, a classic case of inadequate tools, as they wanted with a screwdriver get a nail out of the wall.
Here we are faced with a case, more precisely, in the case of a science. Many scientific theories describe processes: the orbit of the planet, the progress of a chemical reaction, etc. It is (quite wrongly) inferred that science, especially natural science, a special position in view of the future holds. It will always be regarded as a particularly reliable oracle. Now if science in general could see so well in the future, there should not override the current economic crisis. And if science in particular would be able to do so, there should be no man-made disasters such as Chernobyl or the dried Aral Sea. In addition, the report would always agree. Enough evidence to the contrary! But as we have already discussed: science has nothing to do with truth but everything to do with a very efficient method for dealing with reality. It would be a fatal misjudgment of science, so to speak, they degrade into a "super-oracle"!
is also possible to avoid even a second, widespread event right at the beginning: the "futurist" trap. Since the piquancy is already in its name: How does something "do research" (ie deal with the reality) that there is not, by definition? So our brave undaunted the future researchers do research Present and the past to provide trends (and if they do not even know anymore, even "mega trends") to close, and again from today morning. This contradicts the only real experience we have the steady transition from the present into the future: The future is different, it is surprising and it is the source of "new", "not-never-been done before." So even this tempting basis of the future view is untenable (although it is delivering entertaining books also quite worth reading, if not "faith-value" are.
place where so I taking me? From where I will take the charge in the future ? Well, the easiest way out is the future not to "predict". It also saves all the same trouble with not arrived prophecies. I will therefore only the principles of development that we can derive from the earlier contributions in discourse. And I am their logical connections, to show their interactions. So do not predict what the future looks like, but a guide on how to "make" future.
I know that I am so very full mouth. But I think we first need to tear down some outdated and fossilized approaches to make sense to go to the construction of the building of the future. And we need some risk in this construction project. But as they say in the third and very little verse sung by the Austrian national anthem: "With courage, into new times, free, and they believed us walk ...". I happen to have a soft spot for third stanzas, although they are hardly sung, but often have a lot of wisdom in it.
brings me to the last location information that I need to do before I serve. In my view we are faced with a very sharp break with our next steps from today into tomorrow. This finding is based on an analysis of the present. We see strong environmental challenges: the large cycles of nature are shaken, we have an unparalleled extinction of species, we have encountered the ecological carrying capacity limits of almost all ecosystems in which People live. We are facing a profound change in the resource base of our society, as oil and natural gas in the foreseeable future in increasingly smaller quantities are available. We midst of an economic crisis, and no one saw coming that no one knows how the economy will look like "after". We are faced with massive changes in the political arena, with a Europe that is growing internally and externally, with the U.S., as a world power fade slowly and with entirely new players like China and India, but also for political Islam on the world stage. I no more and no less than a "turning point" expect, one of those extraordinary times in which the logic of Development is changing in all areas. Especially in such times it is both stupid and criminal, to the here and now want to derive the morning!
So, I stand firmly, and now my charge: the future perspective is always shaped by the people of the evolution of the forces shaping them. One can see this, one can not predict the future, but probably the reasons and motivations of the actions that are set by people. Next closed, you do not know what to build the people, but you know WHY they want to build it.
This is so to speak, once the "twist" that I give to my ball. Now comes the direction: the development paradigm of this era is the self-organization, that is exactly the kind of edifice that we have spent our forward post from a scientific point of view. Gone are the days of the mechanistic picture of the development as the end of a cosmic machine. Gone are the associated logics that growth as well as the independence of the systems to the radical, independent individuality of people, their detachment from nature and the fate of other people.
He is now flying, my ball Now I am waiting for your "Return" with great anticipation. Let's build a guide to action for the future on the basis of self-organization! What kind of a game!

With best wishes to you and your people

Your Michael

Homemade Telescope Camera Adapter

With or against the self-organization - The prelude to the future

Dear Willy,

is unfortunately a lot of time gone by since you gave me your last post you sent future. For my late reply, there are many reasons, but a very important, I believe we are entering a new Quality in our discourse.
To stay in our parable of the Ping-Pong, so we strain our common way of shaping the future of post over and over: your last ball was not returned I, you made the point! I think we have time being told all that the scientific basis for our further projects darstellt.Wir do so solutions to offer a good way in the future. If it is really important prevents us no one getting back science to argue further. Now, let us but turn to the conclusions which in our view of reality in general and the self-assembly in particular for concrete social development results.
So I will make a mark. Like any impact this will also be carefully considered and well placed. That is one reason for the long time of my silence, but now I think I have identified the point on your half of the table, I want to take in order to find again a good game. But first I must put myself in position to have to find exactly my position so I can set the correct premium. Therefore, I must be connected for a while with my view on the future and I think about the purpose of this next "game" stop.
must first agree to that course, that no one knows what the future actually will look like. I, too, and I think, not even you. There is simply no way to predict. Nevertheless, do the people since the beginning of time, even if they were always disappointed since then. Even today we see the weather report on television banned, probably know that the weather is so similar to or completely different can be. There must be something deeply human need in the future vision and it can not be the truth of the forecast, because otherwise we would have to have given up the long evolutionary. The most significant
look into the future seems to me the possibility of the orientation of one's actions. We always prepare ourselves for the future. We want the best out our future and the future of the people in our circle of life, our families and friends, our cities and countries, and indeed the world, makes. It is quite interesting that this "in-the-future-looks" very parallel to our ethical framework is: Our ethics we use to guide our actions. Incidentally, this analogy holds up to the Valuation: We take our expectations of the future as a measuring line for assessing the success of our actions. Similarly, we take our ethical framework to evaluate our actions ex post.
Why me this digression important? On the one hand, I want to show that the view into the future important for us humans, is so vital. He makes us human, it allows us to plan and evaluate our actions.
want other hand, I also recall are as closely related to our value system and our future vision together and interwoven. Future appears to be the place to meet the our forward-looking ratio and our ethos.
future vision obviously has two sides: an ethical and rational. A beschrebt the field of what is desirable and one that is possible, the probable describes. Also n the future we will post this dichotomy can not escape, though we will play heavily on the rational side.
Now a second coordinate my position. If we can once metaphysical methods for the future vision in mind (that is, all the nice ladies with crystal balls, the different oracle at Delphi and Olympia, the Leberbeschau and the interpretation of bird flight and many others, quite comprehensively what people use to satisfy their future urge all! ), then we shall for the determination of the future, only the knowledge of the present are available. Already we are in a nice and inescapable paradox: we know only ensures that the future will be different than the present. Nevertheless, we must take this in hand, what we know about the present. Actually, a classic case of inadequate tools, as they wanted with a screwdriver get a nail out of the wall.
Here we are faced with a case, more precisely, in the case of a science. Many scientific theories describe processes: the orbit of the planet, the progress of a chemical reaction, etc. It is (quite wrongly) inferred that science, especially natural science, a special position in view of the future holds. It will always be regarded as a particularly reliable oracle. Now if science in general could see so well in the future, there should not override the current economic crisis. And if science in particular would be able to do so, there should be no man-made disasters such as Chernobyl or the dried Aral Sea. In addition, the report would always agree. Enough evidence to the contrary! But as we have already discussed: science has nothing to do with truth but everything to do with a very efficient method for dealing with reality. It would be a fatal misjudgment of science, so to speak, they degrade into a "super-oracle"!
is also possible to avoid even a second, widespread event right at the beginning: the "futurist" trap. Since the piquancy is already in its name: How does something "do research" (ie deal with the reality) that there is not, by definition? So our brave undaunted the future researchers do research Present and the past to provide trends (and if they do not even know anymore, even "mega trends") to close, and again from today morning. This contradicts the only real experience we have the steady transition from the present into the future: The future is different, it is surprising and it is the source of "new", "not-never-been done before." So even this tempting basis of the future view is untenable (although it is delivering entertaining books also quite worth reading, if not "faith-value" are.
place where so I taking me? From where I will take the charge in the future ? Well, the easiest way out is the future not to "predict". It also saves all the same trouble with not arrived prophecies. I will therefore only the principles of development that we can derive from the earlier contributions in discourse. And I am their logical connections, to show their interactions. So do not predict what the future looks like, but a guide on how to "make" future.
I know that I am so very full mouth. But I think we first need to tear down some outdated and fossilized approaches to make sense to go to the construction of the building of the future. And we need some risk in this construction project. But as they say in the third and very little verse sung by the Austrian national anthem: "With courage, into new times, free, and they believed us walk ...". I happen to have a soft spot for third stanzas, although they are hardly sung, but often have a lot of wisdom in it.
brings me to the last location information that I need to do before I serve. In my view we are faced with a very sharp break with our next steps from today into tomorrow. This finding is based on an analysis of the present. We see strong environmental challenges: the large cycles of nature are shaken, we have an unparalleled extinction of species, we have encountered the ecological carrying capacity limits of almost all ecosystems in which People live. We are facing a profound change in the resource base of our society, as oil and natural gas in the foreseeable future in increasingly smaller quantities are available. We midst of an economic crisis, and no one saw coming that no one knows how the economy will look like "after". We are faced with massive changes in the political arena, with a Europe that is growing internally and externally, with the U.S., as a world power fade slowly and with entirely new players like China and India, but also for political Islam on the world stage. I no more and no less than a "turning point" expect, one of those extraordinary times in which the logic of Development is changing in all areas. Especially in such times it is both stupid and criminal, to the here and now want to derive the morning!
So, I stand firmly, and now my charge: the future perspective is always shaped by the people of the evolution of the forces shaping them. One can see this, one can not predict the future, but probably the reasons and motivations of the actions that are set by people. Next closed, you do not know what to build the people, but you know WHY they want to build it.
This is so to speak, once the "twist" that I give to my ball. Now comes the direction: the development paradigm of this era is the self-organization, that is exactly the kind of edifice that we have spent our forward post from a scientific point of view. Gone are the days of the mechanistic picture of the development as the end of a cosmic machine. Gone are the associated logics that growth as well as the independence of the systems to the radical, independent individuality of people, their detachment from nature and the fate of other people.
He is now flying, my ball Now I am waiting for your "Return" with great anticipation. Let's build a guide to action for the future on the basis of self-organization! What kind of a game!

With best wishes to you and your people

Your Michael

I Wan To Disconect My Line Letter

'organic mendacity'

"Apart from the deliberate lies and falsification, there is still what to call 'organic mendacity' is. Here is the forgery not in consciousness, as in ordinary lie, but by way of experience to consciousness, that is in the nature of the mode of formation of ideas and values of the feeling. 'Organic hypocrisy is everywhere where there where people think only what their' interest ' is modified or that serves any setting of instinctual attention and already in the process of reproduction and of remembering the content in that direction. Who 'dishonest' is needed, not to lie! What does the constitutive honest the deliberate falsification, which makes him even at the tendentious involuntary automatism of remembrance, the imagination and sense of education. can at the periphery of consciousness can dominate the most staid, honest attitude.

(Max Scheler, Resentment in the construction of moralities , Frankfurt / M., 1978, p. 33)

I Wan To Disconect My Line Letter

'organic mendacity'

"Apart from the deliberate lies and falsification, there is still what to call 'organic mendacity' is. Here is the forgery not in consciousness, as in ordinary lie, but by way of experience to consciousness, that is in the nature of the mode of formation of ideas and values of the feeling. 'Organic hypocrisy is everywhere where there where people think only what their' interest ' is modified or that serves any setting of instinctual attention and already in the process of reproduction and of remembering the content in that direction. Who 'dishonest' is needed, not to lie! What does the constitutive honest the deliberate falsification, which makes him even at the tendentious involuntary automatism of remembrance, the imagination and sense of education. can at the periphery of consciousness can dominate the most staid, honest attitude.

(Max Scheler, Resentment in the construction of moralities , Frankfurt / M., 1978, p. 33)

Stranne Light Bulb Replacement

water at interfaces - the birth of order and constant renewal

Dear Michael, Tuesday, 16/09/2001



Thank you very much for your future post of 9 August 2009. I was quite surprised that it's you again succeeded in such a heavily cut back to play ball so elegant. You have not only managed to save the ball but have him placed centrally and challenged my whole ambition drive the process further.
Shall we therefore turn to the further exploration of the great moments of evolution. I think we are agreed that the partitioning of energy in the various dissipative, (water-bound) processes such as evaporation, chemical reactivity and charge separation and water oxidation in accordance with small rooms by feedback to harmonic vibration patterns of varying intensity leads. As an example, one leading the Trillerpfeifchen to its size and its spatial form sounds of different frequencies and in respect of its air flow generated tones of different intensity. By doubling the whistle, the intensity of the sound can be further increased or the air flow can be increased.
The chemical potentials and the reactivity of the phase boundaries of water to solids or greater Molecules or organisms are therefore at a given temperature is always higher than in the water.
reaction products (radicals, precursors) are formed at such interfaces directly to your school under the prevailing dynamic conditions (temperature) moves to where cause the least potential and thus prevails a minimum flow of energy or where by further reaction (polymerization, condensation) of the radicals, the potential is lowered further, a stabilization of the formed molecules and the coherence (a function of embedding) increased. The reaction process is continued at constant renewal of the potential until the formation and decay in the reaction chamber a dynamic equilibrium form. If several reactions take place is the most stable reaction product that also lowers the potential best represent the most sustainable and will continue to build up to new potentials and new structural conditions. These reactions also lead to an increase in heat capacity. Branching processes (Bifurkationsprozesse) will be launched if rise by instabilities in the dynamic process of the variances, thereby perfecting open circuits, the efficiency decreases and residual potentials occur.
Do we want a system now turn to the bifurcation points (in the sense Prigogine). Generally, it can be concluded that bifurcations (branches) occur only in energiedissipativen dynamic systems and always then when in the local dynamic process of exhaustion or alteration of capacitive sizes, a limitation occurs.
be the example of a branching stream, the branching process easily understood. The stream is slowed down from his sole while shifting material and chemical erosion, the width - depth variance increases. It is sorted by the delay material. If with increasing flow in the flattest areas in the places where the bed material can be most easily eroded again forms a new bed, we have two parallel flow beds in a growing, one in a decreasing phase. Fed back to the respective speed of the water and the possibility of the braking is at the sole by the energiedissipativen process the stream bed change constantly. This stream and river valleys are constantly changing along with fertile floodplains receive.
The general law for the dynamics of the bifurcation is thus only on the material properties and distributions of the sole and the energy dissipation occurring at the phase interfaces (water-solid)-dependent. Acceleration zones erode always (mechanical and chemical), while in the delay zones, the material re-deposited (mechanical and chemical) deferred. The zone change is always by an increasing variance of the dynamic display. Fed back to the dynamics of the water flow is here the difference between average speed and average water velocity of material transport is maximized.
too shows that the variances in topography and water holding capacity of vegetation and the dissipation of energy through evaporation (loss of temperature fluctuations) are the determining parameters for the sustainability (efficiency) of a landscape, the dynamics of streams and for the temperature and its distribution is.
It seems that the bifurcation points fed back occur at the spatiotemporal dynamics of the considered system level. The intelligent, uniform and small-scale distribution of energiedissipativen structural damping elements (small-scale and short-circuited recycling) therefore seems to me to be if sustainability is the target for the stability of the subsystems of the highest importance and priority management objective.
In reality, the internalization largely circular closed processes in a cell (with maximum coherence, minimal arbitrariness and minimized openness), the natural approach under dynamic conditions, the dissipative many surviving structures in the potential to maximize the border areas and thus gradually there is balance of power radiation and dissipation of energy to get (down in ordered structures with maximized structural dynamics and minimal temperature). Translated into sustainable development strategy, these are the minimization of entropy and maximization of the thermodynamic efficiency. A dynamically optimizing creation with increasing intelligence (in phase behavior) of dissipative structures (zBOrganismen) and its distribution on the planet could be the (hardly observable because not answerable) question seem secondary to the energetics of the entire universe.
me it is therefore very important nachzuordnen the new Dissipationsebenen of economic and social potentials of the energy potentials, because these for our Companies and the stability of the utmost importance. If the degrees of freedom of the companies are, however, to get in peaceful conditions, this would only be possible if the criterion is recognition of the direction of security in action gradually in general. The dissipation of all potentials in the physical world must therefore also focus largely on the laws of energy dissipation. The closed cycles and the distribution of cycles by management may therefore not lose their stability and the general Beliebigkeitswahn wishful thinking and outdated societies and their economic and sociological paradigms to Fall victim. A recognition of the limited feedback systems would be structured as a basis of peaceful social contracts and the maintenance of the damping properties of natural feedback I believe in the constitution of modern states as equal human rights are taken up and adopted by training in the daily life.
you write "structures and their possible" Dissipationsebenen "are thus two-way mirror!"
Here come the "Out of evolution" into play. Every time, new combinations of these exchange levels, strengthen the interactions on these "new" Dissipationsebenen to whenever there is an evolutionary leap, new systems and thus new replacement levels and new Dissipationspotentiale. "
I think that this is where the emphasis on the criteria for consolidation if the consolidation that is to foster the opening of circuits and thus to a degradation of efficiency leads to deterioration of the economy and resources we harvest fruit dove evolution. Solidification of sustainability-enhancing closure of small-scale circulations in intelligent distribution, however, leads only to positive evolutionary stable results, sustainable structures and the ability to act safely direction.
This would, however, that observable part of the cellular system parameters and their spatiotemporal coupling and distribution would need to meet the energy efficiency criterion, while economic and sociological criteria and the potentials would subordinate the physical potentials. At the same time would have to repair the system and control at national or regional level, cellular structured and not systemically important, not be observable, global context. The relevant processes must first be identified and in feedback to the physical system of locally controlled by the contribution of systemically important attenuators such as the water dissipative processes. Maybe I could
this time with a slightly less cut ball to help match.
With best wishes to you and yours. On your next ping is your

Willy

Stranne Light Bulb Replacement

water at interfaces - the birth of order and constant renewal

Dear Michael, Tuesday, 16/09/2001



Thank you very much for your future post of 9 August 2009. I was quite surprised that it's you again succeeded in such a heavily cut back to play ball so elegant. You have not only managed to save the ball but have him placed centrally and challenged my whole ambition drive the process further.
Shall we therefore turn to the further exploration of the great moments of evolution. I think we are agreed that the partitioning of energy in the various dissipative, (water-bound) processes such as evaporation, chemical reactivity and charge separation and water oxidation in accordance with small rooms by feedback to harmonic vibration patterns of varying intensity leads. As an example, one leading the Trillerpfeifchen to its size and its spatial form sounds of different frequencies and in respect of its air flow generated tones of different intensity. By doubling the whistle, the intensity of the sound can be further increased or the air flow can be increased.
The chemical potentials and the reactivity of the phase boundaries of water to solids or greater Molecules or organisms are therefore at a given temperature is always higher than in the water.
reaction products (radicals, precursors) are formed at such interfaces directly to your school under the prevailing dynamic conditions (temperature) moves to where cause the least potential and thus prevails a minimum flow of energy or where by further reaction (polymerization, condensation) of the radicals, the potential is lowered further, a stabilization of the formed molecules and the coherence (a function of embedding) increased. The reaction process is continued at constant renewal of the potential until the formation and decay in the reaction chamber a dynamic equilibrium form. If several reactions take place is the most stable reaction product that also lowers the potential best represent the most sustainable and will continue to build up to new potentials and new structural conditions. These reactions also lead to an increase in heat capacity. Branching processes (Bifurkationsprozesse) will be launched if rise by instabilities in the dynamic process of the variances, thereby perfecting open circuits, the efficiency decreases and residual potentials occur.
Do we want a system now turn to the bifurcation points (in the sense Prigogine). Generally, it can be concluded that bifurcations (branches) occur only in energiedissipativen dynamic systems and always then when in the local dynamic process of exhaustion or alteration of capacitive sizes, a limitation occurs.
be the example of a branching stream, the branching process easily understood. The stream is slowed down from his sole while shifting material and chemical erosion, the width - depth variance increases. It is sorted by the delay material. If with increasing flow in the flattest areas in the places where the bed material can be most easily eroded again forms a new bed, we have two parallel flow beds in a growing, one in a decreasing phase. Fed back to the respective speed of the water and the possibility of the braking is at the sole by the energiedissipativen process the stream bed change constantly. This stream and river valleys are constantly changing along with fertile floodplains receive.
The general law for the dynamics of the bifurcation is thus only on the material properties and distributions of the sole and the energy dissipation occurring at the phase interfaces (water-solid)-dependent. Acceleration zones erode always (mechanical and chemical), while in the delay zones, the material re-deposited (mechanical and chemical) deferred. The zone change is always by an increasing variance of the dynamic display. Fed back to the dynamics of the water flow is here the difference between average speed and average water velocity of material transport is maximized.
too shows that the variances in topography and water holding capacity of vegetation and the dissipation of energy through evaporation (loss of temperature fluctuations) are the determining parameters for the sustainability (efficiency) of a landscape, the dynamics of streams and for the temperature and its distribution is.
It seems that the bifurcation points fed back occur at the spatiotemporal dynamics of the considered system level. The intelligent, uniform and small-scale distribution of energiedissipativen structural damping elements (small-scale and short-circuited recycling) therefore seems to me to be if sustainability is the target for the stability of the subsystems of the highest importance and priority management objective.
In reality, the internalization largely circular closed processes in a cell (with maximum coherence, minimal arbitrariness and minimized openness), the natural approach under dynamic conditions, the dissipative many surviving structures in the potential to maximize the border areas and thus gradually there is balance of power radiation and dissipation of energy to get (down in ordered structures with maximized structural dynamics and minimal temperature). Translated into sustainable development strategy, these are the minimization of entropy and maximization of the thermodynamic efficiency. A dynamically optimizing creation with increasing intelligence (in phase behavior) of dissipative structures (zBOrganismen) and its distribution on the planet could be the (hardly observable because not answerable) question seem secondary to the energetics of the entire universe.
me it is therefore very important nachzuordnen the new Dissipationsebenen of economic and social potentials of the energy potentials, because these for our Companies and the stability of the utmost importance. If the degrees of freedom of the companies are, however, to get in peaceful conditions, this would only be possible if the criterion is recognition of the direction of security in action gradually in general. The dissipation of all potentials in the physical world must therefore also focus largely on the laws of energy dissipation. The closed cycles and the distribution of cycles by management may therefore not lose their stability and the general Beliebigkeitswahn wishful thinking and outdated societies and their economic and sociological paradigms to Fall victim. A recognition of the limited feedback systems would be structured as a basis of peaceful social contracts and the maintenance of the damping properties of natural feedback I believe in the constitution of modern states as equal human rights are taken up and adopted by training in the daily life.
you write "structures and their possible" Dissipationsebenen "are thus two-way mirror!"
Here come the "Out of evolution" into play. Every time, new combinations of these exchange levels, strengthen the interactions on these "new" Dissipationsebenen to whenever there is an evolutionary leap, new systems and thus new replacement levels and new Dissipationspotentiale. "
I think that this is where the emphasis on the criteria for consolidation if the consolidation that is to foster the opening of circuits and thus to a degradation of efficiency leads to deterioration of the economy and resources we harvest fruit dove evolution. Solidification of sustainability-enhancing closure of small-scale circulations in intelligent distribution, however, leads only to positive evolutionary stable results, sustainable structures and the ability to act safely direction.
This would, however, that observable part of the cellular system parameters and their spatiotemporal coupling and distribution would need to meet the energy efficiency criterion, while economic and sociological criteria and the potentials would subordinate the physical potentials. At the same time would have to repair the system and control at national or regional level, cellular structured and not systemically important, not be observable, global context. The relevant processes must first be identified and in feedback to the physical system of locally controlled by the contribution of systemically important attenuators such as the water dissipative processes. Maybe I could
this time with a slightly less cut ball to help match.
With best wishes to you and yours. On your next ping is your

Willy

27 Weeks Pregnant Headaches

Disspation and Evolution - the inseparable pair

pleased Dear Willy,

Thank you for your future post from 04/27/2009 and ask for forgiveness, that I only now my "ping" on this "Pong" send. The reason is partly in the very difficult personal circumstances, in which I have found me and we were discussing on the occasion of your visit. Now there is something free and I find the leisure to answer you. In addition, I am currently in a hotel in an equally insipid insipid city in the U.S.; double bottom, with something stimulating to deal with!
My personal circumstances are just one factor for the late reply. At least as responsible for the fact that you me to stay in our table tennis language, a fairly sharp bleed ball have served. But that's part of the attraction of our game, 'We have decided from the beginning that we do not pay braves scientific "retired game" where we would always try not to go to our borders as possible. We want to take risk, and your last ball is white is not all a brave back-and-Zurückgeschupse with regard to the common doctrines. Good, so it should also ! Go
As with many difficult balls in the Ping-Pong you have to jump back a few steps to accept it and perhaps even more successfully to bring to the table. This is another reason for my delayed response. What should be on an all-round positive and profound statement of self-organization to answer, without taking into generalities excuse?
Here is my attempt, and I would like to try the two of you brought into play arguments: the development by dissipation and diversity as the basis of evolution.
You write very neatly and clearly about the process of dissipation and the paramount role of water in our Life system, as the main medium plays this dissipation of energy pulses. This argument I would like to take up a bit and continue.
The great and wonderful "trick" of nature is its ability to build structures from energy pulses. You described it so beautifully and vividly. But what I want to stress especially from your description is the fact that the dissipation must be in a much broader spectrum of interactions going on than the original pulse. Our nature is full of good examples for this, from the mechanical movement of air, driven by the information received by the solar radiation over the issue that you mobilize of water by evaporation, the coming raining and the induced mechanical movement of water from the mountain into the valley and on into the sea, where this cycle can begin anew. Our life process itself is an example of where to build the solar radiation chemical and biochemical reactions of organic substances of maximum complexity, which can be a part formed structures (all our animals) and on the other hand, exchanged between living things in a constant cycle of birth and death and again becoming. All this is of course very simply, you will surely deliver the deeper science in a "Pong".
the point I am out of here, however, dissipation that "up to transform" the original quality of the interaction process that could be exchanged, leading to interactions in a much more highly organized systems.
I want to run a little. We know that energy itself is a structured interaction. The radiation we receive from our parent star, is structured, no matter whether we are thinking in waves (ie, spatially and temporally structured fields) or quantized particles. The exchange of energy between us and the sun is driven by the potential difference in terms of heat radiation, thus the different temperature between the Earth and sun.
We also know that matter is nothing more than very highly structured energy is (anything else would our popular Mr. Einstein rotate in his grave). What Dissipation now accomplishes is that triggered by a pulse of an exchange of size (eg, the comparatively very little structured solar radiation) processes in a system with a much higher degree of order (such as the air or the water cycle, which indeed must know, clearly the matter be assigned to) be.
far, everybody will say: "Of course, what Repeat this simple knowledge of what a commonplace". The interesting thing is that these operations obey suddenly other potential systems. The water that down the mountain roars, cares not a jot about temperature differences! It follows the potential difference between up and down, the space provides a rugged surface. The tiger that tears a buffalo cares not about the temperature difference between him and his prey! Those operations are quite different potentials are responsible potentials between much more highly organized systems in comparison to that, its pulse that triggered the whole thing.
I go a step further. Where did all these potentials are used in the systems of higher order? If there were the valleys without the constant tooth of the water by the sun pulse time and again evaporated and rains? If there were the buffalo or the tiger without the dissipation of solar radiation by living systems, which are the food chain for the buffalo? The interesting answer is probably that dissipation is not only the motor tasks in ever more structured systems, but form that dissipation by more and more and more structured systems. The secret "trick" for this process is that it is not only a much larger range of potentials for dissipating uses when she finds the basic pulse, but that it will further potential itself forms in which they developed more organized structures, which again much more structured exchange sizes mobilize. One could "Formulate dissipative basic tenet of self-organization" therefore one: A self-organizing system is the more efficient the larger the range of its available potential, and it is more successful, the faster it will generate new, more sophisticated systems, thereby expanding the range of its dissipative potential.
After this a bit like ex-Catedra "smelly proposition LAID for the second point of my response: diversity as the basis of evolution. The following is actually quite logically from the previously projected. Variety of structures also means diversity of possible exchange of sizes. Structures are always the mirror of their possible interactions with their Contemporary world, which include the exchange processes are all "equal and lower" levels. Everyone can connect both in an intensive, intellectually high talk with his peers and a stone across the water of a lake or jump can connect with a hot water bottle to heat exchange. Structures and their possible "Dissipationsebenen" are thus two-way mirror!
Here come the "Out of evolution" into play. Every time, new combinations of these exchange levels, strengthen the interactions on these "new" Dissipationsebenen to whenever there is an evolutionary leap, new systems and thus new Exchange levels and Dissipationspotentiale.
An example from the history of mankind is to illustrate this: Many thousands of years man entered a new, qualitatively different mode of interaction with nature. By hardening the confrontation with the surrounding plants (which he had previously collected), created by new ideas and technologies from self-reflection within the human society, was agriculture. Suddenly a whole new "Dissipationsebene introduced, the exchange of goods across the pure family associations also. Consequently, emergence of new structures such as cities and empires, on whose level, with rules for the dissipation could. New potential (economic and social potentials) were formed and subsequently the world.
I think that we should also address in our other "Future Post-Dissipationsvorgängen" the interesting question of how the the "Out of evolution," now come about. I know here is no general answer, but some elements are already clear. On the one hand, it obviously needs of reflection, so the interaction and their Verstätigung in a system. Here you have already referred to it with your own comments on "standing waves". On the other hand, it requires a sufficient critical and becoming the river (maybe that was the number in field crops of people in a particular place). And finally, it requires a "trigger", very similar to the bifurcation of Prigogine. But exactly how the proceeds should be part of ur other "matches" to be!

Dear So much for today and many greetings to all your


Michael

27 Weeks Pregnant Headaches

Disspation and Evolution - the inseparable pair

pleased Dear Willy,

Thank you for your future post from 04/27/2009 and ask for forgiveness, that I only now my "ping" on this "Pong" send. The reason is partly in the very difficult personal circumstances, in which I have found me and we were discussing on the occasion of your visit. Now there is something free and I find the leisure to answer you. In addition, I am currently in a hotel in an equally insipid insipid city in the U.S.; double bottom, with something stimulating to deal with!
My personal circumstances are just one factor for the late reply. At least as responsible for the fact that you me to stay in our table tennis language, a fairly sharp bleed ball have served. But that's part of the attraction of our game, 'We have decided from the beginning that we do not pay braves scientific "retired game" where we would always try not to go to our borders as possible. We want to take risk, and your last ball is white is not all a brave back-and-Zurückgeschupse with regard to the common doctrines. Good, so it should also ! Go
As with many difficult balls in the Ping-Pong you have to jump back a few steps to accept it and perhaps even more successfully to bring to the table. This is another reason for my delayed response. What should be on an all-round positive and profound statement of self-organization to answer, without taking into generalities excuse?
Here is my attempt, and I would like to try the two of you brought into play arguments: the development by dissipation and diversity as the basis of evolution.
You write very neatly and clearly about the process of dissipation and the paramount role of water in our Life system, as the main medium plays this dissipation of energy pulses. This argument I would like to take up a bit and continue.
The great and wonderful "trick" of nature is its ability to build structures from energy pulses. You described it so beautifully and vividly. But what I want to stress especially from your description is the fact that the dissipation must be in a much broader spectrum of interactions going on than the original pulse. Our nature is full of good examples for this, from the mechanical movement of air, driven by the information received by the solar radiation over the issue that you mobilize of water by evaporation, the coming raining and the induced mechanical movement of water from the mountain into the valley and on into the sea, where this cycle can begin anew. Our life process itself is an example of where to build the solar radiation chemical and biochemical reactions of organic substances of maximum complexity, which can be a part formed structures (all our animals) and on the other hand, exchanged between living things in a constant cycle of birth and death and again becoming. All this is of course very simply, you will surely deliver the deeper science in a "Pong".
the point I am out of here, however, dissipation that "up to transform" the original quality of the interaction process that could be exchanged, leading to interactions in a much more highly organized systems.
I want to run a little. We know that energy itself is a structured interaction. The radiation we receive from our parent star, is structured, no matter whether we are thinking in waves (ie, spatially and temporally structured fields) or quantized particles. The exchange of energy between us and the sun is driven by the potential difference in terms of heat radiation, thus the different temperature between the Earth and sun.
We also know that matter is nothing more than very highly structured energy is (anything else would our popular Mr. Einstein rotate in his grave). What Dissipation now accomplishes is that triggered by a pulse of an exchange of size (eg, the comparatively very little structured solar radiation) processes in a system with a much higher degree of order (such as the air or the water cycle, which indeed must know, clearly the matter be assigned to) be.
far, everybody will say: "Of course, what Repeat this simple knowledge of what a commonplace". The interesting thing is that these operations obey suddenly other potential systems. The water that down the mountain roars, cares not a jot about temperature differences! It follows the potential difference between up and down, the space provides a rugged surface. The tiger that tears a buffalo cares not about the temperature difference between him and his prey! Those operations are quite different potentials are responsible potentials between much more highly organized systems in comparison to that, its pulse that triggered the whole thing.
I go a step further. Where did all these potentials are used in the systems of higher order? If there were the valleys without the constant tooth of the water by the sun pulse time and again evaporated and rains? If there were the buffalo or the tiger without the dissipation of solar radiation by living systems, which are the food chain for the buffalo? The interesting answer is probably that dissipation is not only the motor tasks in ever more structured systems, but form that dissipation by more and more and more structured systems. The secret "trick" for this process is that it is not only a much larger range of potentials for dissipating uses when she finds the basic pulse, but that it will further potential itself forms in which they developed more organized structures, which again much more structured exchange sizes mobilize. One could "Formulate dissipative basic tenet of self-organization" therefore one: A self-organizing system is the more efficient the larger the range of its available potential, and it is more successful, the faster it will generate new, more sophisticated systems, thereby expanding the range of its dissipative potential.
After this a bit like ex-Catedra "smelly proposition LAID for the second point of my response: diversity as the basis of evolution. The following is actually quite logically from the previously projected. Variety of structures also means diversity of possible exchange of sizes. Structures are always the mirror of their possible interactions with their Contemporary world, which include the exchange processes are all "equal and lower" levels. Everyone can connect both in an intensive, intellectually high talk with his peers and a stone across the water of a lake or jump can connect with a hot water bottle to heat exchange. Structures and their possible "Dissipationsebenen" are thus two-way mirror!
Here come the "Out of evolution" into play. Every time, new combinations of these exchange levels, strengthen the interactions on these "new" Dissipationsebenen to whenever there is an evolutionary leap, new systems and thus new Exchange levels and Dissipationspotentiale.
An example from the history of mankind is to illustrate this: Many thousands of years man entered a new, qualitatively different mode of interaction with nature. By hardening the confrontation with the surrounding plants (which he had previously collected), created by new ideas and technologies from self-reflection within the human society, was agriculture. Suddenly a whole new "Dissipationsebene introduced, the exchange of goods across the pure family associations also. Consequently, emergence of new structures such as cities and empires, on whose level, with rules for the dissipation could. New potential (economic and social potentials) were formed and subsequently the world.
I think that we should also address in our other "Future Post-Dissipationsvorgängen" the interesting question of how the the "Out of evolution," now come about. I know here is no general answer, but some elements are already clear. On the one hand, it obviously needs of reflection, so the interaction and their Verstätigung in a system. Here you have already referred to it with your own comments on "standing waves". On the other hand, it requires a sufficient critical and becoming the river (maybe that was the number in field crops of people in a particular place). And finally, it requires a "trigger", very similar to the bifurcation of Prigogine. But exactly how the proceeds should be part of ur other "matches" to be!

Dear So much for today and many greetings to all your


Michael

Kiera Knightley Brazilian Wax

limits as a condition of self-organization

Michael,

Thanks for your secondary line. While the reality in our day, apparently looking at the upper and lower limits of the universe, I will now try a few thoughts on "self-organized" revitalization of our earth from the water or from water to derive. "Aqua vitam donat "Water gives life, or is directly or indirectly associated with the molecule and its properties. Water as the main energiedissipatives medium serves as the transport, reaction and coolant. Three different cyclic energiedissipative properties has this medium, namely, 1 to evaporate) when heated, 2) form at phase boundaries potentials due to increased charge separation and thus to enable chemical reactions or speed up, and 3) in living cells by water splitting and the synthesis of carbohydrates to energy storage for the operation of life processes by combustion of hydrogen to water by oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide, releasing energy hold.
We know that at a temperature of c. 300 ° K, each molecule in constant motion (vibration) and still water almost everywhere continuously available in liquid form.

Even pure water is by Dissoziationseigenschaften and the formation of hydrogen bonds in spatially and temporally variable, limited units - in clusters - broken. This structural property, the density anomaly of water to follow. A warming of the water from 0 ° C to 4 ° C leads to a contraction in volume, structure, improvement or a Entopieabsenkung.

Another important property of water is its ability to dissolve salts and ions to form a cargo carrier. By allocating a certain amount of water molecules to each ion within a single ion containing only the concentration range order and the Contiguous (consistency) of the formed ion solution increased. This is reflected in a lowering of freezing point and boiling point elevation. The liquid phase will be extended by a further volume contraction takes place, the temperature drops, the vibration properties are improved and the stability of the water-ion cluster. By the ions in the solution are also shares in addition to the polarity of the water already given (para) magnetic properties the electrical properties of reinforced so that the water interact-ion clusters with electromagnetic fields.

would have to phase boundaries originally a harmonious movement of the water molecule by a different harmonic motion that is the surrounding medium overlaid and the vibrational states are modulated so that the displacements are of the water molecules from the mean part, more, some less than in the unmodulated state. These deflections are the energy potential (pH), the reactions of the water control with other molecules.
The deflections of the water molecule determine, however, controlled space-time, the pH or the specific reactivity of the water. By a controlled harmonic injection of energy pulses should our water molecule up rocks so as to be able to be lowered in several stages, the pH and the stability criteria for the water to be achieved and exceeded and divided the water molecule to form hydrogen in the status nascendi. In such conditions can be assumed that carbon dioxide from bicarbonate ions are formed and are formed by lowering the energy density is only unstable Kohlehydratradikale that form with the release of energy and glucose in a row next to cellulose and starch (polysaccharides) can be polymerized. In such reactions would, of course, the allocation of the reactants and may be the removal of the reaction products in places with minimal energy density within the standing wave fields at each reaction. The reaction centers and the steady entropieabsenkende metabolism could this structural molecules (with the function of aperiodic crystals) in a - / + are dynamic, interference-free space (Hilbert space) is controlled so that Entropieminima as domains with minimal random shares (maximum of stable, closed internal circuits result) would have. The reaction products
be dynamically formed so long and are deposited on low-energy points to a chemical equilibrium, the production rate equals the decay rate and thus can be exact spatial and temporal conditions were met.

The role of water while the dissipative medium would be analogous to its role in the formation of sand dunes on the beaches of the sea. Constantly breaking waves dissipate their energy in interactions with the underlying sand, the individual sand grains stand by the resultant buoyancy of the sand structure, thereby sorting the sands by outweighs speed it up to the gravity lift and the larger grains of sand a little earlier than the smaller grains of sand again be deposited in this way, the shock wave marks (ripple marks) made with the property, the highest sand grains to exchange more often than those already formed stable (dissipative) structures.

This pattern formation (structure formation) as long as the energy structure in the form of (sun) is available pulses must always take place. Disturbances inevitably lead to the evolution of a pattern characterized by always field at phase boundaries, even at quite the same temperatures and chemical potentials in the form of mechanical modulation differences (pH differences) are available and run reactions. Every river is becoming a most stable structure by the speed of the transported material in relation to water speed is gradually lowered the maximum. Ie, the "life process" of a River leads both to more stable conditions with trained by constant "interference" by short-wave (sometimes even life) processes in the catchment area are always new variants of the ever improving energy dissipation at surfaces and phase boundaries with better closed loop control.

We have seen that is formed under the steady influence of more or less stable energy pulses a stabilizing dissipative structure to continue growing phase boundaries. This results in more closed and circulated material structures that reduce the energy flows and the "entropic disorder" , Engegenwirken so that a continuous increase of entropy are qualified. The universe has to serve not necessarily as a boundless Entropiemüllhalde.

The formative feature of our observable universe from Earth, then, is the dynamics of interaction in feedback from water to other matter. The philosophical question to be asked my opinion is still the question whether we should require outside the area observed a continuity that we observe in practice within our area before.
Whether derived from the observable means of a mathematical proof, usually with circular structure of the way to the reality of physical laws leaves as for example in Roger Penrose's book is "The road to reality .- A complete guide to the laws of the universe." asserts seems uncertain.

on the consideration of the water and the water molecule on its distribution in the universe we know neither space nor in time very little, except that our intellectual capacities are developed immediately from the interaction of water to constantly becoming and passing substantive phase or membrane interfaces. Is not the hope of growth and evolution of organisms, and ultimately the spirit of humanity with the eternal hope of infinity and fulfillment of the compass that drives us to the islands of sustainability, as you've described it so eloquently in your book.

I think that we from the average perspective of what we experience directly and watch should make our future. The fact that we had the transition from what and what is persistent, then can make better if we seek in the next step of our hubris of the limited superior knowledge of a prior understanding of the relationships that we see life as a path and the target of an evolution where our World intrnalisieren in ourselves rather than with maximum energy our future and our subsistence (the ability to survive on its own land area) put at risk.

The entire structure of our water-dependent Creation in self-similar (fractal) structures on the nano-organism up to the annual rent standing spring landscape with its recursive couplings is to humanity and its still under development, based intelligence. At regular intervals, resulting singular time frame for abrupt changes, it was a Menetekelbotschaft or the collapse of the mind and enslaving the human society. Today's threat is to a man despising science tries to run through simple silver bullet, brought in more and more money-driven central state entities as the state religion, globalized, all action and synchronized to leave.
This boundless company divested itself of the most important process to ensure a sustainable future that is the evolutionary process to provide the necessary flexibility to adapt organisms to the most site-and time-related phase dynamics. Evolution is also an energy-driven process of priority at phase boundaries and proceeds transferred to this relatively low-level potential in momentum. Too high and low cutoff potentials lead to disasters or social inefficiency. This development occurs by excessive or incorrect phase regulation of companies by means of laws with universality and is too large centralized political Units achieved. The findings show of Leopold Kohr (The Breakdown of Nations) as the growth of nations increasingly can increase the social inefficiency and thus promotes the decay. For this reason, it seems important to situate decentralized structures in the first place to revive, situate democracy locally and to make the socialization process continuously and efficiently.

Have tried this time in a sweeping water-related social and scientific concerns and perhaps take up the education in our society in the future and more water-bound organisms as to create event-oriented. Looking forward to a ping as the next post from you Regards Willy

Kiera Knightley Brazilian Wax

limits as a condition of self-organization

Michael,

Thanks for your secondary line. While the reality in our day, apparently looking at the upper and lower limits of the universe, I will now try a few thoughts on "self-organized" revitalization of our earth from the water or from water to derive. "Aqua vitam donat "Water gives life, or is directly or indirectly associated with the molecule and its properties. Water as the main energiedissipatives medium serves as the transport, reaction and coolant. Three different cyclic energiedissipative properties has this medium, namely, 1 to evaporate) when heated, 2) form at phase boundaries potentials due to increased charge separation and thus to enable chemical reactions or speed up, and 3) in living cells by water splitting and the synthesis of carbohydrates to energy storage for the operation of life processes by combustion of hydrogen to water by oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide, releasing energy hold.
We know that at a temperature of c. 300 ° K, each molecule in constant motion (vibration) and still water almost everywhere continuously available in liquid form.

Even pure water is by Dissoziationseigenschaften and the formation of hydrogen bonds in spatially and temporally variable, limited units - in clusters - broken. This structural property, the density anomaly of water to follow. A warming of the water from 0 ° C to 4 ° C leads to a contraction in volume, structure, improvement or a Entopieabsenkung.

Another important property of water is its ability to dissolve salts and ions to form a cargo carrier. By allocating a certain amount of water molecules to each ion within a single ion containing only the concentration range order and the Contiguous (consistency) of the formed ion solution increased. This is reflected in a lowering of freezing point and boiling point elevation. The liquid phase will be extended by a further volume contraction takes place, the temperature drops, the vibration properties are improved and the stability of the water-ion cluster. By the ions in the solution are also shares in addition to the polarity of the water already given (para) magnetic properties the electrical properties of reinforced so that the water interact-ion clusters with electromagnetic fields.

would have to phase boundaries originally a harmonious movement of the water molecule by a different harmonic motion that is the surrounding medium overlaid and the vibrational states are modulated so that the displacements are of the water molecules from the mean part, more, some less than in the unmodulated state. These deflections are the energy potential (pH), the reactions of the water control with other molecules.
The deflections of the water molecule determine, however, controlled space-time, the pH or the specific reactivity of the water. By a controlled harmonic injection of energy pulses should our water molecule up rocks so as to be able to be lowered in several stages, the pH and the stability criteria for the water to be achieved and exceeded and divided the water molecule to form hydrogen in the status nascendi. In such conditions can be assumed that carbon dioxide from bicarbonate ions are formed and are formed by lowering the energy density is only unstable Kohlehydratradikale that form with the release of energy and glucose in a row next to cellulose and starch (polysaccharides) can be polymerized. In such reactions would, of course, the allocation of the reactants and may be the removal of the reaction products in places with minimal energy density within the standing wave fields at each reaction. The reaction centers and the steady entropieabsenkende metabolism could this structural molecules (with the function of aperiodic crystals) in a - / + are dynamic, interference-free space (Hilbert space) is controlled so that Entropieminima as domains with minimal random shares (maximum of stable, closed internal circuits result) would have. The reaction products
be dynamically formed so long and are deposited on low-energy points to a chemical equilibrium, the production rate equals the decay rate and thus can be exact spatial and temporal conditions were met.

The role of water while the dissipative medium would be analogous to its role in the formation of sand dunes on the beaches of the sea. Constantly breaking waves dissipate their energy in interactions with the underlying sand, the individual sand grains stand by the resultant buoyancy of the sand structure, thereby sorting the sands by outweighs speed it up to the gravity lift and the larger grains of sand a little earlier than the smaller grains of sand again be deposited in this way, the shock wave marks (ripple marks) made with the property, the highest sand grains to exchange more often than those already formed stable (dissipative) structures.

This pattern formation (structure formation) as long as the energy structure in the form of (sun) is available pulses must always take place. Disturbances inevitably lead to the evolution of a pattern characterized by always field at phase boundaries, even at quite the same temperatures and chemical potentials in the form of mechanical modulation differences (pH differences) are available and run reactions. Every river is becoming a most stable structure by the speed of the transported material in relation to water speed is gradually lowered the maximum. Ie, the "life process" of a River leads both to more stable conditions with trained by constant "interference" by short-wave (sometimes even life) processes in the catchment area are always new variants of the ever improving energy dissipation at surfaces and phase boundaries with better closed loop control.

We have seen that is formed under the steady influence of more or less stable energy pulses a stabilizing dissipative structure to continue growing phase boundaries. This results in more closed and circulated material structures that reduce the energy flows and the "entropic disorder" , Engegenwirken so that a continuous increase of entropy are qualified. The universe has to serve not necessarily as a boundless Entropiemüllhalde.

The formative feature of our observable universe from Earth, then, is the dynamics of interaction in feedback from water to other matter. The philosophical question to be asked my opinion is still the question whether we should require outside the area observed a continuity that we observe in practice within our area before.
Whether derived from the observable means of a mathematical proof, usually with circular structure of the way to the reality of physical laws leaves as for example in Roger Penrose's book is "The road to reality .- A complete guide to the laws of the universe." asserts seems uncertain.

on the consideration of the water and the water molecule on its distribution in the universe we know neither space nor in time very little, except that our intellectual capacities are developed immediately from the interaction of water to constantly becoming and passing substantive phase or membrane interfaces. Is not the hope of growth and evolution of organisms, and ultimately the spirit of humanity with the eternal hope of infinity and fulfillment of the compass that drives us to the islands of sustainability, as you've described it so eloquently in your book.

I think that we from the average perspective of what we experience directly and watch should make our future. The fact that we had the transition from what and what is persistent, then can make better if we seek in the next step of our hubris of the limited superior knowledge of a prior understanding of the relationships that we see life as a path and the target of an evolution where our World intrnalisieren in ourselves rather than with maximum energy our future and our subsistence (the ability to survive on its own land area) put at risk.

The entire structure of our water-dependent Creation in self-similar (fractal) structures on the nano-organism up to the annual rent standing spring landscape with its recursive couplings is to humanity and its still under development, based intelligence. At regular intervals, resulting singular time frame for abrupt changes, it was a Menetekelbotschaft or the collapse of the mind and enslaving the human society. Today's threat is to a man despising science tries to run through simple silver bullet, brought in more and more money-driven central state entities as the state religion, globalized, all action and synchronized to leave.
This boundless company divested itself of the most important process to ensure a sustainable future that is the evolutionary process to provide the necessary flexibility to adapt organisms to the most site-and time-related phase dynamics. Evolution is also an energy-driven process of priority at phase boundaries and proceeds transferred to this relatively low-level potential in momentum. Too high and low cutoff potentials lead to disasters or social inefficiency. This development occurs by excessive or incorrect phase regulation of companies by means of laws with universality and is too large centralized political Units achieved. The findings show of Leopold Kohr (The Breakdown of Nations) as the growth of nations increasingly can increase the social inefficiency and thus promotes the decay. For this reason, it seems important to situate decentralized structures in the first place to revive, situate democracy locally and to make the socialization process continuously and efficiently.

Have tried this time in a sweeping water-related social and scientific concerns and perhaps take up the education in our society in the future and more water-bound organisms as to create event-oriented. Looking forward to a ping as the next post from you Regards Willy

Biffy Clyro'smidi Files

From the finiteness of self-organization

Dear Willy,

many thanks for your last, very insightful post future and please forgive my somewhat long silence. But I will again continue to work on our long Dialogue, take up a lot last ausdeiner speak and my argument as well as your thoughts continue with another piece.
You wrote in your last post separated from the transformations of Newtonian physics, the mass and energy to consider something new, a dynamic system of interaction effects donkey. Right here is for me the important point to which you then subsequently also take a very detailed reference: We are facing one (or better we are already in the midst of a) turning the view of the "what" and the "how something is."
Consider what is so out of your as well as my previous contributions seems clear that the reality does not simply have "things" but rather just "processes", especially processes of the interaction between limited entities (which in itself back processes, but it maybe in a future post later). Nothing is, everything is, one could formulate exaggerated.
As you mention correctly, yes we can perceive without interaction does not, and without awareness, it would indeed be difficult to have a reality. We have now shown very well and do it as a basis for our further discussion Just set a time.
But wait, before we go further, we should have a bit to deal with what the now a "process": there is no more and no less than the logical consequence of the two essential factors of our previous discussion, the finiteness of the " cellular structures "on the one hand and the interaction between them on the other.
First, the finite: no infinite system may be increased by an interaction ändern.Das say even our less enlightened past natural laws already. An infinite mass about (and every infinite system is always infinite in all its properties, otherwise it would not just endless!) Can not by a finite force (or Andeer a finite size effect can be changed). If force is mass times acceleration is equal, then at infinite mass and a finite force, the acceleration is always zero. Eh very clear. What else but finite force but should apply a finite system as a cellular interaction?
Where once the first part of the derivative: interaction, so the change because of the other is bound to finitude.
Now the second part: Every finite interaction between finite cellular processes change their character. I have already explained in my previous post future. This change is always alternately (see the example of supercooled tourers and the warming oven: The hikers will be comfortably heated, the furnace cold). Precondition is that possible between the two systems is an exchange. Interaction is only possible if a partner something "does not have" and another little "too much" has. This always refers to qualities (the "potentials"), in our case is about the temperature of the two bodies "oven" and "tourers". Then an interaction, which tries to compensate for this "potential difference.
We are richer by one more fact of flight, time. Each interaction changed the direction of these changes, we take as "time" is true. Time is nothing more than a hand, a product the finiteness of the fragmented our reality. She is on the other hand nothing but the manifestation of the fact that all the parts, all "cellular units" of our reality is in constant interaction, are therefore constantly changing. So without any interaction finitude, as a consequence of the finite but compelling interaction and it necessarily the Ableutung the time the sequence of changes in the various cellular structures due to the interaction. Reality is therefore not fixed, not a "thing in itself, but a constant flow of interaction and change, a process. Reality is a process.
But now it is exciting, we can ie two Types of processes to think. On the one hand, processes that lead to compensation and other self-organizing processes. Compensatory processes are tedious and can be dealt with here briefly: For them, the interaction leads simply to the fact that the cellular entities that are involved in moving closer in character and eventually be indistinguishable. If our tourers leaves his hut, because lures out in the sunshine in the morning, then the entities, "stove" and "office" soon finally reach a balance in temperature. Between them, no (heat) exchange is no longer possible, because they are in their nature (at least in terms of the exchange of heat approximate) finally complete: you eventually have the same temperature. We speak here also of the balance between n of them related to my potential, and nothing else so that when the they no longer have become distinct, that they have become for this particular emersion not just two, but just a system. If you like, they are in relation to the heat exchange "dead" now.
The second kind of processes on the basis of interaction is much more important. You have in your previous contributions have such interesting examples: the climate, the processes in the growing of biomass, and much more. These processes are characterized in that they lead not just to "balance", no death state. There are general development processes.
unetrescheidet Now what these development processes from those that lead to a dead balance? Here there is an answer out of your second last post: the pulse.
A pulse is a very special form of interaction: it is "temporary." This means that it is there once again and then just gone. Once on, one off, a wave that is. We can already see why nature builds its exchanges so often waves: Our reality is a self-organizing process that just builds on that interactions lead to something new and not the death of the involved systems.
The important thing for pulse-exchange transactions, that they create is always the possibility that the parties retain their ability to exchange systems. There is not a potential difference that is "used up" slowly but surely, but the potential difference, which is necessary for the exchange, is produced repeatedly anew. The pulse (ie the change in potential) which is offered increased, just the chance that an interaction takes place. If the potential of the "transmitter" is greater than that of the "recipient", so it can come to exchange ideas. The transmitter emits something that the recipient gets something. So that the receiver can again receive something, you have to give him "time" Get the digest. This "time" he needs to to run the processes in its interior (within the cellular structure) that make it again, "listening".
So, that was now safe to put it more roughly. We shall call the process of interaction with other cellular units once "perception" and those of "digesting" the effect "dissipation." And here is a new interesting question: How "digest" cellular systems, the interaction with other systems?
The interesting thing is that there is a clear direction of the dissipation. Cellular units to build structures to enable the next pulse if possible even better . Use This means that the processes need to be changed inside the individual cells. It must be "structures" are built. Here, structures no more than other internal "cellular units" that can interact with each other. The more and more diverse, these internal cellular units (which are nothing but more "processes"), the smaller are the potential differences that are necessary to the captured by the interaction "income" of the large private system within their own " "Exchange of cellular structure, the" big small ", the potential of the entire system held, and the more the next time Pulse are recorded.
There seems to a very clear logical line from the "finality" to the "interaction" of the "interaction" to "Time", by the time Auffassumg of reality as a "process" and from there to the momentum of the " Self-organization leads.
This is even a bit further substance to our future post.
perhaps very briefly to your criticism of the scientists, which I share but when I leave but perhaps more lenient rule. Scientists are just people like everyone else, they want respect and security. Bedie they get when they work within the Energy Conservation Code boundaries of their craft. Who brings the boat to shake is not very considered. Therefore, scientists are usually conservative and less innovative. That is one side. The other side is that in this trade also always great outsider and "Conqueror" is the reality that have the power to influence entire generations. Even to use this innovative power I believe in science, so slow, slow, may seem brutal and often without their spirit striving forward.
extent now of me and I've been waiting very excited about your next post!

Michael

Biffy Clyro'smidi Files

From the finiteness of self-organization

Dear Willy,

many thanks for your last, very insightful post future and please forgive my somewhat long silence. But I will again continue to work on our long Dialogue, take up a lot last ausdeiner speak and my argument as well as your thoughts continue with another piece.
You wrote in your last post separated from the transformations of Newtonian physics, the mass and energy to consider something new, a dynamic system of interaction effects donkey. Right here is for me the important point to which you then subsequently also take a very detailed reference: We are facing one (or better we are already in the midst of a) turning the view of the "what" and the "how something is."
Consider what is so out of your as well as my previous contributions seems clear that the reality does not simply have "things" but rather just "processes", especially processes of the interaction between limited entities (which in itself back processes, but it maybe in a future post later). Nothing is, everything is, one could formulate exaggerated.
As you mention correctly, yes we can perceive without interaction does not, and without awareness, it would indeed be difficult to have a reality. We have now shown very well and do it as a basis for our further discussion Just set a time.
But wait, before we go further, we should have a bit to deal with what the now a "process": there is no more and no less than the logical consequence of the two essential factors of our previous discussion, the finiteness of the " cellular structures "on the one hand and the interaction between them on the other.
First, the finite: no infinite system may be increased by an interaction ändern.Das say even our less enlightened past natural laws already. An infinite mass about (and every infinite system is always infinite in all its properties, otherwise it would not just endless!) Can not by a finite force (or Andeer a finite size effect can be changed). If force is mass times acceleration is equal, then at infinite mass and a finite force, the acceleration is always zero. Eh very clear. What else but finite force but should apply a finite system as a cellular interaction?
Where once the first part of the derivative: interaction, so the change because of the other is bound to finitude.
Now the second part: Every finite interaction between finite cellular processes change their character. I have already explained in my previous post future. This change is always alternately (see the example of supercooled tourers and the warming oven: The hikers will be comfortably heated, the furnace cold). Precondition is that possible between the two systems is an exchange. Interaction is only possible if a partner something "does not have" and another little "too much" has. This always refers to qualities (the "potentials"), in our case is about the temperature of the two bodies "oven" and "tourers". Then an interaction, which tries to compensate for this "potential difference.
We are richer by one more fact of flight, time. Each interaction changed the direction of these changes, we take as "time" is true. Time is nothing more than a hand, a product the finiteness of the fragmented our reality. She is on the other hand nothing but the manifestation of the fact that all the parts, all "cellular units" of our reality is in constant interaction, are therefore constantly changing. So without any interaction finitude, as a consequence of the finite but compelling interaction and it necessarily the Ableutung the time the sequence of changes in the various cellular structures due to the interaction. Reality is therefore not fixed, not a "thing in itself, but a constant flow of interaction and change, a process. Reality is a process.
But now it is exciting, we can ie two Types of processes to think. On the one hand, processes that lead to compensation and other self-organizing processes. Compensatory processes are tedious and can be dealt with here briefly: For them, the interaction leads simply to the fact that the cellular entities that are involved in moving closer in character and eventually be indistinguishable. If our tourers leaves his hut, because lures out in the sunshine in the morning, then the entities, "stove" and "office" soon finally reach a balance in temperature. Between them, no (heat) exchange is no longer possible, because they are in their nature (at least in terms of the exchange of heat approximate) finally complete: you eventually have the same temperature. We speak here also of the balance between n of them related to my potential, and nothing else so that when the they no longer have become distinct, that they have become for this particular emersion not just two, but just a system. If you like, they are in relation to the heat exchange "dead" now.
The second kind of processes on the basis of interaction is much more important. You have in your previous contributions have such interesting examples: the climate, the processes in the growing of biomass, and much more. These processes are characterized in that they lead not just to "balance", no death state. There are general development processes.
unetrescheidet Now what these development processes from those that lead to a dead balance? Here there is an answer out of your second last post: the pulse.
A pulse is a very special form of interaction: it is "temporary." This means that it is there once again and then just gone. Once on, one off, a wave that is. We can already see why nature builds its exchanges so often waves: Our reality is a self-organizing process that just builds on that interactions lead to something new and not the death of the involved systems.
The important thing for pulse-exchange transactions, that they create is always the possibility that the parties retain their ability to exchange systems. There is not a potential difference that is "used up" slowly but surely, but the potential difference, which is necessary for the exchange, is produced repeatedly anew. The pulse (ie the change in potential) which is offered increased, just the chance that an interaction takes place. If the potential of the "transmitter" is greater than that of the "recipient", so it can come to exchange ideas. The transmitter emits something that the recipient gets something. So that the receiver can again receive something, you have to give him "time" Get the digest. This "time" he needs to to run the processes in its interior (within the cellular structure) that make it again, "listening".
So, that was now safe to put it more roughly. We shall call the process of interaction with other cellular units once "perception" and those of "digesting" the effect "dissipation." And here is a new interesting question: How "digest" cellular systems, the interaction with other systems?
The interesting thing is that there is a clear direction of the dissipation. Cellular units to build structures to enable the next pulse if possible even better . Use This means that the processes need to be changed inside the individual cells. It must be "structures" are built. Here, structures no more than other internal "cellular units" that can interact with each other. The more and more diverse, these internal cellular units (which are nothing but more "processes"), the smaller are the potential differences that are necessary to the captured by the interaction "income" of the large private system within their own " "Exchange of cellular structure, the" big small ", the potential of the entire system held, and the more the next time Pulse are recorded.
There seems to a very clear logical line from the "finality" to the "interaction" of the "interaction" to "Time", by the time Auffassumg of reality as a "process" and from there to the momentum of the " Self-organization leads.
This is even a bit further substance to our future post.
perhaps very briefly to your criticism of the scientists, which I share but when I leave but perhaps more lenient rule. Scientists are just people like everyone else, they want respect and security. Bedie they get when they work within the Energy Conservation Code boundaries of their craft. Who brings the boat to shake is not very considered. Therefore, scientists are usually conservative and less innovative. That is one side. The other side is that in this trade also always great outsider and "Conqueror" is the reality that have the power to influence entire generations. Even to use this innovative power I believe in science, so slow, slow, may seem brutal and often without their spirit striving forward.
extent now of me and I've been waiting very excited about your next post!

Michael

Where To Watch Nfl Playoff Games In Dubai

space and time in the reality

8th Dear Michael, Sunday March 2009-03-09



your thoughts on "initial and end "I found very interesting especially at the high school I had a teacher who introduced us even an infinite number of randomly-dependent members and talked about a necessary condition for the entire series. I would therefore like to say today about the reality of our spatial and temporal boundaries or on the conceptualization of reality something that I have been very busy.

Our human perception seems from the sensory impressions that are processed in our brain to images exist. About sensations and their processing, we are energetically coupled to the environment. The impressions lead to different patterns of feedback, that are perceived either as passive reflections or consciously as actions. Of interest to the real space and time experience seems to me the individual for the purposes of (skanäle) existing, dubbed crossover in the human brain to be, both for the sense of touch, hearing and the sense of sight at a frequency of <> 20 Hz is a continuum of the sensory impression that is perceived to be a pressure, a sound or a color. The superposition of frequency-related comment is perceived by the brain as an image, depending on the modulation (external and active internal) move or appear (only active internal) immobile. With active internally to mean here that the sensors with respect Direction and intensity of the sense impression in feedback can be controlled.

It seems to me that the experience of energetic interactions for these reasons may be perceived by us only in a spatial-temporal nature and the inertia of the moving "interactive" masses. Now based on our perception of the energy (force) as the mass times the moment.

In classical (Newtonian) physics, the concepts of matter and energy could be considered very independent of each other but now it is coupled only be seen as an interaction. This is the classic "thing in itself" as a static structure to dynamic system which at least two different Objects (one of which may be the observer), the first of their interaction (dynamics) can be observed.

will ask you what course such considerations are necessary?

Then I will try to give two answers:

1) Our interaction sun - earth shines through the energiedissipativen (distributed energy) processes (ordering cycles) led to the structuring of our planet and an orderly continuous lowering of the energy potential to have. The most important energiedissipative medium was placed on the water, distributed by the space-time reduction in energy density over the entire Earth's surface temperature and controls and thus a variety building material cycles as cycles and life processes. It is evaporated, in other places again formed precipitate. The charges (electrons and protons) in water are separated at an interface, substances are dissolved and reprecipitated. Rock is weathered and increases the surface energy. Water is split in living cells. It is not the formation of oxygen in the atmosphere either as a set of "renewable" fossil energy source in the ground and severely time shifted again used in respiration or other organisms and used as food. It was temperature distributions, atmospheric composition and energetics of the planet by constant energy active Circuits controlled primarily in the biosphere.

The current climate models

2) All this stands in stark, contrast to the current climate models.
The evolution of life processes from existing structures or energiedissipativen the dynamic phase boundaries for water had to necessarily result in dynamic conditions with reduction of the initial energy densities and the temperature to more dynamic metabolizing structures. The seas were initially already in coupled temperature-induced chemical gradients chemoautotrophic bacteria (which gain their energy to build up biomass from oxidative or reductive reactions). In a were initially reducing atmosphere was created consisting of carbon dioxide and methane in water column autotrophic, photosynthetic organisms, the water and where the hydrogen in the nascent status could reduce CO2 Kohlehydratradikalen. These short-lived substances have been transformed at the source later with further energy release sugar, starch and cellulose. Thus, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere up to 0.2-0.3% CO2 to be lowered as much a limiting factor for further increase in the production processes was initially respired during methane by methane-oxidizing bacteria using oxygen to form their own biomass was. Powerful biogenic deposits in the form of coal seams originated on land. Powerful biogenic sedimentary calcium deposits formed in the oceans. The composition of the atmosphere was so at any time from a static chemical equilibrium but characterized by the gradual evolution of energiedissipativen life processes. A release of energy in the universe, and a reflection of long wavelength light in the universe are therefore highly speculative since the heat of the earth changed since the formation of biogenic atmospheric little more by cooling (radiation in the universe). This observation can also lead to the conclusion that a spherical radiation in anisotropic material environment is more an exception than the rule.

While depending on the distance source-sink is a sink for radiation that appears to be almost empty space to be hardly affected his substantial heat capacity. On the contrary seems more the temperature of a radiator at the lack of sinks in the feedback to the temperature and the temperature causing the process to the limits of stability to increase. The measurements of electromagnetic radiation back to the earth by satellite sensors are able to place our hardly interpreted as interactions accounted for only identifiable source and sink conditions. Sensors in the room are cooler than if the source thermodynamic sinks and in relation to their identity as the heat capacity singular artifacts in the universe. Feynman's electrodynamic theory of light (QED) is required as a sink material, electrons and protons. For this reason, the albedo are reviewed and their significance for the energetic radiation balance.

The acceleration of the atmosphere by the radiation emitted from energy plants heat (generally> 50% of the energy converted, in connection with the destruction of the temperature-compensating evaporation from the leaves of the vegetation and dew formation, desiccation of the soil and the earth's surface through massive interventions in the soil water (mining, Siedlungswasserwirschaft, agriculture) cause destruction of natural Damping mechanisms. These lead to a large extent to the present observed changes in climate, the warmth of the ocean and melting of glaciers.

to repair the altered climate, therefore, entirely different measures are needed as a proscription established the life-giving carbon metabolism and a people-stultifying certificate trade on economic "science" considerations which have just falsified only by the collapse of the financial system itself and the possibly to a spread of our societies increasingly threatening nuclear power with the irreversible processes of contamination by radioactive Drop out.

The state of climate science

me it is therefore inconceivable that the energetic role of dissipative water vegetation and material processes that deny hold as cycles a steady flow of energy-reduction and ordering energetics of dissipative circuits with appropriate cooling of the phase boundaries by the IPCC is. Furthermore, I find it inexplicable how science could corrupt the extent that they no longer even the simplest relationships for survival and sustainability of the increasingly global society, of the present design of the hardware (physical system) and software (eco-social economy system) and control can. On the contrary, the outlawing of climate skeptics and the rejection of a broad-based scientific debate seems our modern science to lead to a crisis that we have historically in medieval times and in times of decline of political culture but already experienced. This politically-driven large-scale research facilities threaten with little more unsurpassable numerical acrobatics, their dogmatic simplicity and their scientific correctness "and endanger global survival by increasing the irreversibility of our future. The non-renewable energy sources can easily be spared any of the fuel taxes and transportation taxes, even without climate simulation models. Dear

Michael, please bring me back to better thoughts for the near future post or let me wake up from this nightmare science. Next time I will discuss something more sustainable. I promise!

Best regards from Berlin Your Willy