future post: 29.04.2010
development in Europe, from democracy to dictatorship of fear?
Dear Michael, you wrote very aptly
"being against something" that is "all control" program in your future last post. An analysis of the media you seem right to give. Fear and terror seem to be the role of the social drive to dominate increasingly. The deliberate steps in a humane future seem to fade and the "brave in the new times" seems to have lost. A new system of values can still coming. From such a divide us still national Egoism. It seems as if the social gains of the company of a acquis true of currency stability would be sacrificed. It turns out that the new acquis is based on fear and control and could only protect such a phase in the global neo-liberalism rapidly after harvest.
Evolutionary seems as if to protect an ever-improving strategy of nature, the most important achievements in resource-optimized cells and promote the internalization of subsistence in increasingly robust developing life process, come for companies from the fashion would not be viable anymore. A living, improved resource utilization as a driver of sustainable nature and evolution is no longer seen as a value base of companies but the set is diametrically opposed to rapid growth, maximization of wealth and happiness relatable purported goal of the company. This goal is increasingly trying to control fear and horror, penalties and fines and to defend stupidity on the part of the monopoly on power.
This phase seems to be almost the last contingent of a development that is dedicated to the perpetual growth and vehemently rebelled against the laws of nature and thus a too-early evening of the companies, their culture and civilization in your portfolio to the next compulsory step of evolution, namely, a society escape from new imprinted human reason without further growth of physical wealth.
I think that gradually there comes a time when all companies have to check in or around their values. Was there something to the election posters of the Austrian presidential election?
It seems the change is not so difficult. Maybe we should present our sub-optimal constitution of political parties, revise and promote the localization of citizens in a regional structure than habitat. It ought to be possible to re-integrate the citizens in a home and to situate him politically without him obsessively on a home to bind populist. This seems to me the authorities of our countries to serve in far too low as the citizens. You always have the feeling that legal framework and its administration does not want to serve the citizens but is still trying to present the resulting slavery as a result of legal constraints. It would
the ranking of each cell are more recognized and strengthened while countries, societies and Europe in the democratic structure on the basis of subsidiarity should define their activities and control over the jurisdictions would have. This
subsidiarity in the Maastricht treaty for Europe in general was provided, Brussels (EU) and forget this even a parliament set up far away from citizens and thus doomed to failure or a planned economy.
the most important in a new society would be a single progressive taxation on resources (real land value + real annual revenue) with a possibly leasable allowance at the lower end of the scale and an unconditional basic income for all citizens (from cradle to grave) in the amount of eg about 200-400 €, including a basic health insurance. This would include both health insurance and pension funds, pension funds and their administrations are unnecessary and yet lead to a welfare state. Public would be participate through free association as well as economic performance at the free labor market. About the purpose of capitalist and socialist ideologies, then perhaps you could think in peace. Communications and other human and social activities would be again in the center of such companies. The individual states would be characterized by balanced monetary attitude (without surpluses or deficits) and perfected internalized circular economy based on the polluter pays principle. Of course, the Parliament would fall prey to the difficult task for the citizens reasonable transitional provisions and a workable solution corridor to find.
However, it seems that only with completely new approaches in education and in daily life, the negative motivations and driving forces in society such as greed, hatred, envy and hunger, slavery and injustice in the minds of the citizens to be replaced by social thinking and feeling .
The trick with which this could be possible is related to the trick of European nationalist and National Socialist ideas by the European Union to urge the sidelines. Cells of appropriate size and structure to promote such a way that optimization can be done about the sustainability of the resource economy of the individual cells and not by a more erratic control marked by the "divide and conquer" as in the present state entities with maximum tax from any work for everyone without regard to the structure thereby increasing risk of irreversible losses. This work is any day in the individual cells (including families) to the detriment of the people and their well being enforced everywhere (see Hartz IV).
seem to mind me also the unique feature of the way toward a better future to be linked to design the original marked by arbitrariness reproductive strategy without regard for losses to a through recycling marked survival strategy and a new habitat for the new man in to create a better future by largely closed cell structures.
I know I'm a dreamer, but I firmly believe in these dreams. Still, I see repeated in the future by reading your last post to the increasing convergence of what you wrote. Dear Michael
forgive me that my contribution required much time and this time become somewhat shorter. I hope he still meets our goals and our purpose. Quite the best for your family. Your Willy
0 comments:
Post a Comment