Tuesday 20 November 2010
Dear Michael,
your comments in the ultimate future post for me were very convincing or mandatory. I have taken the break between our future postal activities to determine how it might look to alternatives to the already developed in our correspondence future approaches. How
seems I have not done enough thinking about the differences between ownership and possession. When I think of the quote from Goethe's Faust "What you inherited from your fathers - must earn in order to possess it," this would mean that only the sustainable farming justifies a land area of the property. One would therefore not manage the property through the tax at the relatively rapid loss of property. Unsustainable use could the While land value decrease over time but increased slightly in proportion to the current land value to be taxed additionally on a damage amount.
Maybe we should just turn on the management of resources and reduced taxation. The approach of an annual tax of the current land value would be determined by the actual area Lagebeiwert * * * Größenbeiwert Energiebeiwert * = Nutzungsbeiwert realizable value - land value exemption (as part of taxation and thus the social base funding). The coefficients were determined to be covered for the land to be taxed in a democratic manner by the Company and the supreme courts of the regular review and dynamic that is set for manageable periods. The current uses and changes could be collected from the area sharply set up a dynamic monitoring satellite and probe system.
You would pass it by the control-intensive, individual taxation of work and power at a resources tax system that can be monitored objectively. The taxes would be paid by the municipalities of the regions to the federal government and Europe. The skills could largely rest with the municipalities, the citizens would resurface and locates the needed today is inevitable held held mobility of goods and people could thus perhaps be attributed to a human scale.
"moonlighting" as a category would be dropped after the introduction of two social tools such as a basic pension with health care (from cradle to grave) and a temporary leasable land value tax relief for many professions. One way this could make the administrative costs and cost of controls largely redundant and replace the pension insurance, the basic pension. It could also dependencies between taxable landowners and landless citizens are prepared by the leasable land value tax allowance of landless citizens, could lead to landlords with high marginal tax rates to a reduction in individual tax burden.
As far as my simple ideas for a future cellular structured society as the basis for a necessary evolution of culture located social skills and a basic democracy. The basis of democracy is now almost completely undermined by a redundancy in our governance structures and elections and parliaments in some cases 5 levels. The result is no more coherent structure with less accountability to the individual against and largely based on the monopolistic power of individual states. The embeddedness of individuals in family structures is largely by isolation lost. The ease of management was the most important characteristic sought for society members and implemented by administrative routines for children and young people, for the workers, and pensioners.
The ever expansive monetary system, together with the increasing social costs leads to an inevitable collapse of those systems. The renowned Viennese economics professor Franz Hörmann criticized the economics as unscientific political propaganda, the current system has failed and awaits for 2011 a fundamental change of system. is
As a possible way of Hörmann the fate of Russia with the collapse seen in individual states and local currencies. The diminishing effectiveness of our rapidly growing company structure, would be restored by the land value by significantly shorter internalized material and monetary cycles with the coverage of the currencies. It would be to think if some state entities seek to achieve an economic objective, the World Cup in the export and make this material accessible imbalance conditions that ultimately led to conflicts and wars in
purchase.
The basic idea of a peaceful change of regime would change in an object-oriented world be in a relationship-oriented world where the quality of life between people in the Communication (which constitutes the essential feature of human society) is measured and perfect internalized material prosperity is no longer on industrial innovation but at the cellular capability in a society dominated culture located material and product recycling in the context of natural energy resources.
As far as my thinking for this time you should simultaneously represent a connection to the rapidly approaching Christmas and the evolution of our natural resource economics as an optimization process where only a temporary possession and no longer exists the property show. With best wishes for the approaching Christmas, you and your dear family
Willy
0 comments:
Post a Comment