Dear Michael,
are sincere thanks for your letter of the year, your suggestions for future issues, particularly on self-organization of a sustainable society is considered to be worth a little closer.
What struck me immediately in your blog are the approaches to social control, this is happening today almost always means laws that have arisen at least in our countries, "democratic" and be enforced by the monopoly of power. Since the stone tablets of Moses to the rules would now all quarries and mountains are needed. It seems therefore that kind of control excessive, largely unnecessary, since it automatically becoming accessible larger inefficiencies that the management and control effort increases and the punitive measures require increasingly higher costs. Self-organization and boundaries requires feedback, but these are by distributions of surface and surface facilities and managerial number of people given in the room. In human societies, almost all feedback were eliminated gradually and replaced by any regulatory efforts by individual governments. For legislators, there is little criteria for sustainable legislation. Over time, all the evolutionary rules of the company have trained with administrative guidelines been. We need today a complex and sophisticated institution of justice, to manage the company and look into the laws of the premolars, the ability to succeed again and again without fear of feedback. This is probably one of the Gündem is why determining the size of a social structure Efizienz and sustainability as Leopold Khor has clearly recognized. Of course this is related to the education of our children in the home and our schools. Otherwise there would be a correlation between the PISA results and the size and stability of our societies.
also seems that the knowledge in our schools as an abstract knowledge with universality is taught as a so-called "objective knowledge". The examination of the practice allows us to recognize, however, soon realized that our knowledge derived from the theories that require respect for our practical experience and knowledge of the spatial and temporal distributions, dynamics and properties of objects and their surroundings. The devil is indeed as we know in detail - the reduction of our knowledge, for this reason but for activities in a specific environment created, such as in a kitchen, a workshop or factory successfully possible, but appears to the practical problems of our environment in interaction with individual companies, by constantly changing feedback (Everything with everything) and non-linear trends difficult to control, much less predictable, or direction, to plan.
When we see as the most important example of the evolution process of the emergence of the organisms of humans and our environment, we notice that the self-assembly required at the time of the evolutionary processes of hard limits and certain system parameters because only under limited conditions in relatively short periods of time are more or could develop less closed circuits and is optimized under these conditions, the efficiency of the systems. The point was that while the improved resource economics of the single system in two ways simultaneously offered to equip the one hand adjacent systems with more efficient organisms or cells, and thereby to displace less efficient to reduce the other hand, internally, the entropy and within the cells or organisms, trouble-free space (Hilbert space) to realize the sustainable with less external metabolic processes could survive. The size and resources of the individual cells were probably decisive for the dynamics of the evolutionary process. Any growth or shrinkage of individual cell was associated with suboptimal reduction of efficiency in resource use. The number of cells per habitat was increasingly dependent on the given space and equipment the more complete dissipation of the habitat available energy.
The coupling of individual cells to different emergent organisms could actually have only one rule of the game, and that a further closing of the circuits at the next higher level. The original with each new cell in the environment increasing entropy could be reduced by these couplings. This was the basis of the metabolic processes the water. The autotrophic organisms (primarily green plants) split the water through photosynthesis into electrons and protons, while fixation of energy during the heterotrophic organisms (mainly bacteria, fungi and animals) through the respiratory Synthesis of water were able to use the recovered energy back dissipative. The better the coupled structure of this food chain was formed (P / R = 1), the better (more coherent and sustainable) developed ecosystems. To the last man as conscious, thinking organism, and chosen as particularly "smart" controller of the ecosystems that create evolutionary occurred, and gradually all boundaries by answering the question "Quis ut Deus?" with the "I removed and now in the Tower of Babel the degradation of castration and its culture, society, and partly with his environment and experience perfecting.
Eliminating any limits to control of markets, the uprooting of peoples, Pisa, selling hot air certificates, burial of greenhouse gases (Vattenfall), decreasing the suffering of "political corectness" with democracy, the privatizing of subsistence will be held today in a witch dance. The hubris (conceit) of companies believe it is today in our school system and knowledge-building process to be removed. While we learn more and more object-related knowledge, but we learn nothing from the value of human relations, nothing custom distributions, our calculation skills are limitless, and thus lose the reference to reality, anisotropic and inhomogeneous nature. The differences between culture and civilization dwindle increasingly loose teaching of history and context.
The most important skills of the people are in the elimination of arbitrariness in the creation of coherence in the taking of human relationships, in creating the necessary back-coupling limits for the self-organization as a way to trouble poor living systems. Cultures would have time and again historical continuity thinly. Criteria in energy use and ways of cushioning in the same controlled, full cycle processes and linkages. All this should convert the object into a living human being and enable people to experience the quality of life in human relationships. A relationship-oriented, consistent Formation instead of a reductionist object-oriented knowledge which is the best possible fit of the people as a temporary, less expensive part in technical systems and law-abiding, each year is more deserving consumers would be a way. I think here we are very united, that "education, the acquisition and maintenance of those skills is that make it possible in a person to participate in the social self-organization" as you have expressed this in your book.
Humanity will certainly not create themselves to eradicate, even though some try to seek some out of stupidity and partly from greed, that. On the contrary, after a period of global decline is a new golden age is not entirely unlikely. After today's so-called democratic society structures based on a more speculative becoming (pseudo) scientific basis to more and more dogmatic and growth come out, and political Alimentation and prostitution of science can hardly sink lower, appears increasingly in small cellular structures, new small-scale and efficient sustainability in the form of a new association on the basis of the relations and communication.
you, dear Michael, have already recognized this early and your activities "flowers and new life in the ruins" are in the service of these developments along the lines provided. You this in the "islands of sustainability" aptly described. An essential part of this development is in my view, the new openness on the Internet, although being the way it Wickileaks realized for me was initially a little getting used to, on closer examination shows, however, in the forums, chats and blogs just such approaches. Also a new "dialect vernacular science science" seems to develop. A sociologist "Ariel Salleh" from Australia has used this expression in her writings. The Internet seems to be an evolutionary component that takes a big influence on the future development and also for me gradually been strong in the school learned of the questions and thus changed the social value judgments. I'm already convinced that this must also our entire school systems to the test, renewed from the ground and I hope can be made even more efficient.
Our entire school system appears highly fragmented, and object-heavy to be. Also, the biology mainly digging around in the tree pane, a truly dynamic model hardly exists and our fears, and ratings include only the opportunity to respond to current structures. The opportunity is in the Ping-Pong game, but also used in the music of "The Stream" to act out and take with less control the phase and partial phase to be a leader is still hardly used. But just because the possibilities seem to me particularly prospectivity and to be interesting.
The problem with a phase shoulder small energies specifically and in phase to use to push a few cycles, the phases and hence to attenuation or steepening effects in patterns of movement or reaction systems appears in the space-time context to be used for energy in almost all areas of use with better efficiency to. Perhaps this would be the point of the dynamic properties of water as seen from directly tackling the analysis of dynamic systems. In medicine today, such methods (eg hyperthermia) in development. I do not know whether in the long run the educational use of dimensionless mass points in the theoretical mechanics needed rather than directly with a dynamic water model with its three dissipative properties to operate at phase boundaries to describe gradients and transport, reactions to estimate and in the greatest generality, the natural dissipative Energy mapping. But what is important above all systems would not be seen primarily as objects rather see their interaction as the essential.
pardon was only a thought. Nevertheless, I believe that we would be well served in science of fully dynamic models of thinking to go out and learn to understand space, time and interaction from the beginning without the static models of first having to teach in the second instance going. The natural sciences would, I think this win very transparent. Our understanding of nature would change so that we could get along without such pollutants, dirt and waste in our language.
You see how I could inspire me from your blog. I am now such that I swim in your suggestion lotions, but can still occur apparently randomly in the patterns of our discourse, similar to our Ping Pong game of the case. Also, I wish you health, Satisfaction and success. It greets you and your family warm
Willy
0 comments:
Post a Comment