beginning and finite
Dear Willy,
You given me in your last post a few to the future, which I would gladly take up and lead "to the beginning" of our reality. This may sound a little cocky, but I believe that it is quite good, first time to clamp a wide frame, and then discuss our development into the future, quite along the lines which you have already drawn in the sand.
In your last post to come again and again terms such as "cellular structure", "phase positions" and the concept of "energy pulse" before. Because I want to hook it and give my view of the logic of development. Why do we have
a reality that is dominated by the concept of finitude? What is finite? What has finally to do with development? The questions I would like today's take on grain.
There are a number of metaphysical explanations for the origin of our reality, our religions are full of it. There is also the scientific metaphysics of the Big Bang, a singular Event for which the rules of our science may not apply, but that should be on the basis of all these rules. With these explanations, I will not stop me, although I like every other human being my own metaphysical explanation available to them. What interests me is actually the logical consequence of finitude.
finiteness requires always "another". If something ends somewhere, is bound to this limit, start something else, and it would be only the "outside room". Finitude is the basic condition for perception in particular and in general interaction: Both are possible only if we have at least two units, and which implies that both are finite. If they were not distinguished from each other, would be one of them "indefinitely", they could not perceive or connect otherwise interact.
would Conversely, no interaction (and "perception" is just a special form of interaction) all infinite, would occur no interaction, there would be no perception of "something else", no proof of the limit and we would again end up at infinity . That would be a very practical sense, when we went with our scientific wits end and could share would have left us to rest. The reality is just to this finitude and thus logically related concept of structured interaction and we must therefore consider further still. But we do note that the finite and the interaction of two logically connected, inseparable concepts. They are our reality based. The reality, therefore, there would be without the finiteness of its parts, without your "cellular structure" would be all infinite primordial soup, as always, we will call the.
any case, they would not be "real."
What our reality that holds together, the interaction between their finite parts. Interaction is just that: change impact. Any interaction (of course have perceptions of how intelligent people recognize Buddha to Schrödinger, changed the participating parts of reality. We are therefore quite naturally from the concept of finality to that of the outlet of the time. Quite efficient for such a short text.
energy in this view is probably nothing more than a "base currency" of the
interactions in the real world. If two units in reality, two things, two "cellular" structures connect with each other in interaction, it is always an energy exchange involved. This exchange changes the units are taking part in this exchange. Think about two bodies, one with high Temperature (around the stove in a ski lodge) and a lower temperature (such as a frozen by hikers). These two units exchange of energy and can be changed. From the tour-goers will be frozen by a cozy, warmed, happy person with time and leisure to be happy about his tour. The furnace is cooled slowly, however, and goes off when he is not fed with more wood failure by our hikers. Both change but by the interaction through the exchange of energy between them, the character.
crucial here is that between the units, which interact with one another in interaction, two basic conditions are met: You must together connect to, such as the fact that they participate in a common field. And there must be some difference that needs to balance it, a potential difference. In our example, this is quite simple: you walk through fields and radiation heat transport through the air in the room each other and their temperature varies.
You now have in your letter also pointed to a further term that the "pulse". This is nothing more than if this interaction, the exchange of energy, a time has changed: He is even stronger, even weak. We all know of course this phenomenon. It is simply the change of day and Night, of seasons, but also the ebb and flow of rainfall and drought. It's just the way we experience our reality that's not a monotonous cruising, but provide a variety of superposition of very different processes.
The pulse changes everything! He is responsible for ensuring that we build structures and it is the foundation of any self-organization. I think the importance we attach to this phenomenon of the Great Unifying link between our ideas. Perhaps we should therefore deal intensively in the next post letters to our future with what pulse means for us.
I'm really looking forward to your next Future post! For normal day greetings
Your Michael
0 comments:
Post a Comment