8th Dear Michael, Sunday March 2009-03-09
your thoughts on "initial and end "I found very interesting especially at the high school I had a teacher who introduced us even an infinite number of randomly-dependent members and talked about a necessary condition for the entire series. I would therefore like to say today about the reality of our spatial and temporal boundaries or on the conceptualization of reality something that I have been very busy.
Our human perception seems from the sensory impressions that are processed in our brain to images exist. About sensations and their processing, we are energetically coupled to the environment. The impressions lead to different patterns of feedback, that are perceived either as passive reflections or consciously as actions. Of interest to the real space and time experience seems to me the individual for the purposes of (skanäle) existing, dubbed crossover in the human brain to be, both for the sense of touch, hearing and the sense of sight at a frequency of <> 20 Hz is a continuum of the sensory impression that is perceived to be a pressure, a sound or a color. The superposition of frequency-related comment is perceived by the brain as an image, depending on the modulation (external and active internal) move or appear (only active internal) immobile. With active internally to mean here that the sensors with respect Direction and intensity of the sense impression in feedback can be controlled.
It seems to me that the experience of energetic interactions for these reasons may be perceived by us only in a spatial-temporal nature and the inertia of the moving "interactive" masses. Now based on our perception of the energy (force) as the mass times the moment.
In classical (Newtonian) physics, the concepts of matter and energy could be considered very independent of each other but now it is coupled only be seen as an interaction. This is the classic "thing in itself" as a static structure to dynamic system which at least two different Objects (one of which may be the observer), the first of their interaction (dynamics) can be observed.
will ask you what course such considerations are necessary?
Then I will try to give two answers:
1) Our interaction sun - earth shines through the energiedissipativen (distributed energy) processes (ordering cycles) led to the structuring of our planet and an orderly continuous lowering of the energy potential to have. The most important energiedissipative medium was placed on the water, distributed by the space-time reduction in energy density over the entire Earth's surface temperature and controls and thus a variety building material cycles as cycles and life processes. It is evaporated, in other places again formed precipitate. The charges (electrons and protons) in water are separated at an interface, substances are dissolved and reprecipitated. Rock is weathered and increases the surface energy. Water is split in living cells. It is not the formation of oxygen in the atmosphere either as a set of "renewable" fossil energy source in the ground and severely time shifted again used in respiration or other organisms and used as food. It was temperature distributions, atmospheric composition and energetics of the planet by constant energy active Circuits controlled primarily in the biosphere.
The current climate models
2) All this stands in stark, contrast to the current climate models.
The evolution of life processes from existing structures or energiedissipativen the dynamic phase boundaries for water had to necessarily result in dynamic conditions with reduction of the initial energy densities and the temperature to more dynamic metabolizing structures. The seas were initially already in coupled temperature-induced chemical gradients chemoautotrophic bacteria (which gain their energy to build up biomass from oxidative or reductive reactions). In a were initially reducing atmosphere was created consisting of carbon dioxide and methane in water column autotrophic, photosynthetic organisms, the water and where the hydrogen in the nascent status could reduce CO2 Kohlehydratradikalen. These short-lived substances have been transformed at the source later with further energy release sugar, starch and cellulose. Thus, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere up to 0.2-0.3% CO2 to be lowered as much a limiting factor for further increase in the production processes was initially respired during methane by methane-oxidizing bacteria using oxygen to form their own biomass was. Powerful biogenic deposits in the form of coal seams originated on land. Powerful biogenic sedimentary calcium deposits formed in the oceans. The composition of the atmosphere was so at any time from a static chemical equilibrium but characterized by the gradual evolution of energiedissipativen life processes. A release of energy in the universe, and a reflection of long wavelength light in the universe are therefore highly speculative since the heat of the earth changed since the formation of biogenic atmospheric little more by cooling (radiation in the universe). This observation can also lead to the conclusion that a spherical radiation in anisotropic material environment is more an exception than the rule.
While depending on the distance source-sink is a sink for radiation that appears to be almost empty space to be hardly affected his substantial heat capacity. On the contrary seems more the temperature of a radiator at the lack of sinks in the feedback to the temperature and the temperature causing the process to the limits of stability to increase. The measurements of electromagnetic radiation back to the earth by satellite sensors are able to place our hardly interpreted as interactions accounted for only identifiable source and sink conditions. Sensors in the room are cooler than if the source thermodynamic sinks and in relation to their identity as the heat capacity singular artifacts in the universe. Feynman's electrodynamic theory of light (QED) is required as a sink material, electrons and protons. For this reason, the albedo are reviewed and their significance for the energetic radiation balance.
The acceleration of the atmosphere by the radiation emitted from energy plants heat (generally> 50% of the energy converted, in connection with the destruction of the temperature-compensating evaporation from the leaves of the vegetation and dew formation, desiccation of the soil and the earth's surface through massive interventions in the soil water (mining, Siedlungswasserwirschaft, agriculture) cause destruction of natural Damping mechanisms. These lead to a large extent to the present observed changes in climate, the warmth of the ocean and melting of glaciers.
to repair the altered climate, therefore, entirely different measures are needed as a proscription established the life-giving carbon metabolism and a people-stultifying certificate trade on economic "science" considerations which have just falsified only by the collapse of the financial system itself and the possibly to a spread of our societies increasingly threatening nuclear power with the irreversible processes of contamination by radioactive Drop out.
The state of climate science
me it is therefore inconceivable that the energetic role of dissipative water vegetation and material processes that deny hold as cycles a steady flow of energy-reduction and ordering energetics of dissipative circuits with appropriate cooling of the phase boundaries by the IPCC is. Furthermore, I find it inexplicable how science could corrupt the extent that they no longer even the simplest relationships for survival and sustainability of the increasingly global society, of the present design of the hardware (physical system) and software (eco-social economy system) and control can. On the contrary, the outlawing of climate skeptics and the rejection of a broad-based scientific debate seems our modern science to lead to a crisis that we have historically in medieval times and in times of decline of political culture but already experienced. This politically-driven large-scale research facilities threaten with little more unsurpassable numerical acrobatics, their dogmatic simplicity and their scientific correctness "and endanger global survival by increasing the irreversibility of our future. The non-renewable energy sources can easily be spared any of the fuel taxes and transportation taxes, even without climate simulation models. Dear
Michael, please bring me back to better thoughts for the near future post or let me wake up from this nightmare science. Next time I will discuss something more sustainable. I promise!
Best regards from Berlin Your Willy
0 comments:
Post a Comment